Bombay High Court Orders BMC to Pay ₹50 Lakh Each to Families of Kurla Fire Victims
Court Slams BMC for “Gross Negligence” in 2015 Fire That Killed Eight Young Men in Hotel City Kinara
Mumbai, June 11: In a rare and sharply worded ruling, the Bombay High Court has ordered the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to pay ₹50 lakh each to the families of eight young men who died in a deadly restaurant fire in Kurla nearly ten years ago. Calling the civic body’s conduct “callous and negligent,” the court held it directly responsible for licensing a restaurant that was operating without essential safety clearances.
A Dinner That Ended in Disaster
The tragedy unfolded on the night of October 16, 2015, when a group of college friends, most of them engineering students in their late teens, gathered at Hotel City Kinara, a small restaurant near Kurla station, for a birthday celebration. Within minutes, a fire—triggered by illegal LPG usage—engulfed the upper mezzanine floor where the group was seated.
All eight were trapped. Seven of them were students from Don Bosco Institute of Technology, the eighth a civil engineer in his early thirties. None survived.
The restaurant was operating on a BMC-issued licence, yet it had no No Objection Certificate (NOC) from the fire department. In fact, multiple inspections between 2012 and 2015 had flagged its structural and safety violations, including the unsafe construction of the mezzanine floor and unauthorized LPG storage.
Court Finds Civic Body Directly Responsible
In its detailed order, a division bench of Justice B.P. Colabawalla and Justice Firdosh P. Pooniwalla made it clear: this was no freak accident. The BMC had been warned—repeatedly. One written complaint in 2012 by citizen Martin Mathews specifically pointed out the fire hazards. Still, the civic body renewed the restaurant’s licence year after year.
The court slammed this as a “clear failure in performing statutory duties,” holding the BMC vicariously liable for the deaths. It also dismissed the ₹1 lakh compensation previously paid to the families as “grossly inadequate” and “symbolic at best.”
A Legal Fight Fought With Grit
After their initial pleas were rejected by the Maharashtra Lokayukta in 2017, the victims’ families filed a petition in the High Court in 2018. It would take them another six years to get this judgment. Their argument was simple: their children died not just because of a fire, but because the system failed to enforce laws meant to prevent such disasters.
Over time, the families gathered proof—inspection reports, official correspondence, complaints—all pointing to a chain of negligence. Their persistence forced the court to examine the deeper failure: not just of a restaurant, but of a governing body that ignored every warning sign.
Compensation for Lives Unlived
The court fixed the compensation at ₹50 lakh per victim, noting that each had a long life ahead—most were on the verge of graduating, entering the workforce, starting careers. The figure reflects more than just potential earnings lost. It acknowledges the trauma, the absence, the futures that ended before they began.
The BMC now has 12 weeks to make the payment. If it misses the deadline, the court has imposed an interest penalty of 9% per annum on the amount until it is paid in full.
BMC Mulls Next Legal Move
Faced with a damning verdict, senior BMC officials are weighing their legal options. Sources indicate the corporation may approach the Supreme Court, though no formal appeal has been filed yet. Internally, discussions have already begun on whether disciplinary action should be taken against officials who ignored the fire risks flagged over several years.
Importantly, the court has left the door open for the BMC to recover the compensation from officers found responsible, a clause that could reshape how civic accountability is pursued in similar cases going forward.
The Criminal Trial Continues
While the civil compensation case has reached a conclusion, the criminal prosecution is still underway. The Sessions Court in Mumbai is hearing charges against the restaurant’s owner and conductor, including culpable homicide not amounting to murder. That trial has seen multiple delays over the years, but observers believe the High Court ruling could lend it fresh urgency.
A Turning Point in Urban Accountability?
Beyond the individual tragedy, the case highlights a broader rot in urban governance. The High Court explicitly invoked Article 21 of the Constitution—the right to life—to underline the duty of public authorities to enforce safety laws. The message was unmistakable: when officials turn a blind eye to violations, they cannot hide behind bureaucracy if lives are lost.
Legal experts believe the ruling may serve as a precedent in similar cases across India, especially in cities where unsafe commercial structures continue to operate with impunity.
“This is not just about one restaurant,” a former municipal official commented. “It’s a wake-up call for every licensing authority in the country.”
For the Families, A Measure of Justice
Standing outside the courtroom, several parents of the victims said they felt a quiet sense of vindication. One mother, her voice barely above a whisper, said, “It’s been nine years. We’ve buried our children, but now at least, someone’s been held accountable.”
Another father said, “We were made to feel like this was just bad luck. But it wasn’t. It was negligence.”
Their words were not bitter—just tired. Tired from the years of silence, the legal battles, and the constant reminders of what was lost.
What This Means Going Forward
With this verdict, the court has done more than offer financial relief. It has drawn a line. If a civic body fails to act on safety violations, it will pay—not symbolically, but substantively. The ruling marks a rare moment of legal clarity in a city where tragedies often fade from public memory.
This time, the court refused to let it fade.
Stay informed with Hindustan Herald—your go-to source for Politics, Business, Sports, Entertainment, Lifestyle & more.
Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, YouTube, and join our Telegram channel @hindustanherald
Ravi Juneja is a student journalist currently pursuing his degree from Makhanlal Chaturvedi National University of Journalism and Communication. With a passion for factual reporting and public interest stories, he covers a wide spectrum of news at Hindustan Herald, including politics, health, technology, entertainment, and global affairs. Ravi is committed to delivering balanced, research-backed journalism with a strong sense of responsibility and independence.
- Ravi Junejahttps://hindustanherald.com/authors/ravi/
- Ravi Junejahttps://hindustanherald.com/authors/ravi/
- Ravi Junejahttps://hindustanherald.com/authors/ravi/
- Ravi Junejahttps://hindustanherald.com/authors/ravi/
